Academic Writing

I have written assignment already and I want to extend it. it is about controversial issue I have the whole arguments and background I need the argument analysis. Analysis of Argumentation: evaluate and weigh the competing arguments and evidence advanced by your stakeholders, clearly taking a side on each issue. Moral Reasoning Analysis: describe the val- ues, obligations, consequences, and normative principles that underlie your stakeholders’ po- sitions on each side. Tentative Position and Solution: present and argue for (tentatively, since you will test this solution in your field research interviews) your own position on the controversy and tentative solution to the problem. Ultimately, you need to decide which side’s arguments are more substantial, complete, current and unbiased, which are better supported by the evidence they cite, which seem more spin than substance, and which are better supported by credentialed experts and authoritative evidence. Note that emotion in itself does not invalidate an argument. Rather, you should consider whether emotions are appealed to in an unwarranted or manipulative way, or if the emotion conceals a lack of sound arguments or evidence. It is likely that both sides will have some “winning” arguments. That is fine—you only have to weigh these, not establish complete dominance for one side See attachments and you can see what arguments I'm advocating for