Metaphysics Question - Repost - open to bidding

Instructions: Do not write Introduction or Conclusion. Answer each question in 1-3 grammatically correct sentences (unless otherwise instructed), and number your answers. Do not write in bullet-points. Your answers must be according to the text and class discussions. There are 18 questions. Each answer is worth 4 points. Partial credit will be given and a curve will be applied. 1) What is the difference in the appearance (not existence, as in the next question) of primary and secondary qualities? Locke 2) What is the difference between mind-dependent and mind-independent existence of primary and secondary qualities – and which qualities are mind-dependent and which are mind-independent? Locke 3) Illustrate the above difference in 1) by applying it to an example of a chair in our classroom. 4) Illustrate the above difference in 2) by applying it to an example of a chair in our classroom. 5) What is the reason why Berkeley thinks that there is no difference in the appearance of primary and secondary qualities? 6) What is the reason why Berkeley thinks that there is no difference in existence between primary and secondary qualities – and are they both mind-dependent or mind-independent? 7) Illustrate the above difference in 5) by examining an example of a chair in our classroom. 8) Apply the above difference in 6) to the example of a chair in our classroom. 9) What is the reason why Locke would – and Hume does – think that substance does not exist? 10) Illustrate the above conclusion in 9) by applying it to an example of a chair in our classroom. 11) What is the reason why Hume thinks that cause and effect do not exist? (You must use the notion of ‘necessity’ in your answer) 12) Illustrate the above conclusion in 11) by applying it to an example of a causal interaction between a marker and a text written on the board by that marker in our classroom. 13) What is the reason why Kant thinks cause and effect does exist? Explain why. (You must use the notions of ‘experience’ and ‘knowledge’ in your answer) 14) Illustrate the above conclusion in 13) by applying it to an example of a causal interaction between a marker and a text written by that marker in our classroom. 15) Describe what it would mean to say that the marker and the text are not related as cause and effect. 16) Describe what it would mean to say that the marker and the text are related as cause and effect – but without necessity. 17) Does Kant think that the causal interaction, that we know and experience to exist the marker and the text, takes place in the appearance of the marker and the text, or in the marker and the text as they are in themselves? 18) Explain why we must think that all causal interaction and all else that we experience and know cannot take place in _____________ (fill in the blank with the opposite of what you choose as the answer to 15). (You must use the notion of ‘necessity’ in your answer)