Academic Writing

hi there I am looking for someone who can do my corporate law assignment. The details are mention below: Marking Criteria: 5 marks Presentation fully up to professional standards in terms of logical ordering of material, quality formatting and structure; could be presented to a client. 4 marks Good quality presentation, obvious effort to make it read well and be easy to follow. Could be presented to a client with changes. 3 marks Clear effort to present well, but falls short in one or two areas. Could be presented to a client with minor to major changes 2 marks Patchy presentation, some things done well, some not. No evidence of editing. 1 mark Form and logical ordering poor, likely to have a fair amount of copying and pasting, and no evidence of editing 0 marks Assignment is just a combination of cut-and-pasted or irrelevant material. Question 1 12 Marks Use the web site of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), the Corporations Act 2001 and (if necessary) other legal sources to answer the following question in 1,200 words or less.  The law discourages directors from being involved in situations of conflict between their personal interest and the interest to act for the benefit of the company. Your task is to explain the general law and statutory principles and application regarding conflicts of interest and the policy reasons the law discourages conflicts of interest. Question 2 6 Marks Use the web page of the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), the Corporations Act 2001 and any other resources you require to answer the following question in 600 words or less.  The Listing Rules contain provisions for continuous disclosure and periodic disclosure. By reference to the rules and statutory provisions, explain the differences and similarities between these two forms of disclosure. Page 3 of 3 Question 3 7 Marks At the website of [login to view URL], locate the Queensland Supreme Court case of Smits v Brown [2012] QSC 180 and answer the following question in 400 words or less.  The issue before the Supreme Court was over debts that had been incurred and whether they were the debts of the partnership. Identify the relevant facts and principles used by the Court to resolve the dispute. From your understanding of partnership law, do you agree with the findings of the Court, why or why not? note: please read the question and marking criteria properly. the answer of the question should be done accordingly. Harvard style referencing should [login to view URL] question 1 for things should written in issue, rule, application and conclusion format and things like general law ,company's statutory and statutory principal. also the policy reason should be explain in same question. saloman vs. saloman case can be good reference for that case. please I am looking for quality work so if you have sound knowledge about corporate law then only send bid. contact me for more details